TL;DR
Get beauty and skincare favorites delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
A friend of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle told The Times that the couple dislike the phrase “working members of the Royal Family.” The source said they work on their own projects while remaining members of the Royal Family, but neither the couple nor the friend is identified by name in the report.
A friend of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle told The Times that the couple dislike the phrase “working members of the Royal Family,” arguing it blurs the distinction between their independent work and service to the royal institution. The report presents the view of an unnamed source, not a public statement from either the Duke or Duchess of Sussex.
The friend, whose identity was not disclosed, described the wording as “a really lazy phrase” and said, “He hates it, she hates it.” The source said the couple are not working for the institution, but remain members of the Royal Family and carry out work of their own.
The source also said the couple’s days are organized around family life and work, adding that Meghan runs a business seven days a week. The report does not independently document their schedules or specify which business activities the source was referring to.
In comments about the Sussexes’ reported visit to Nottingham, the friend said such appearances are not conducted on behalf of the Crown or the royal institution. The source argued that Harry’s status as the King’s son and a member of the Royal Family is distinct from holding a role within the institution. Marie Claire’s report also described a recent move from California to the United Kingdom and the couple’s first official engagement, but the supplied material does not independently verify those details.
Why the Royal Label Matters
The dispute is about more than wording: labels can shape how the public understands the Sussexes’ relationship with the monarchy and the nature of their public appearances. The friend said calling them “former royals” is misleading and affects how people perceive and discuss them. That is the source’s assessment, rather than a measured finding about public opinion.
The distinction raised in the report is between being part of the Royal Family and undertaking duties for the royal institution. Harry and Meghan’s public work and business activity can be described separately from official royal duties; the source says the phrase “working members” wrongly suggests that their work depends on institutional status. The comments offer a view into how at least one person close to the couple believes their roles should be described.
biographies of Meghan Markle and Prince Harry
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
The Sussexes’ Institutional Roles
The report frames the comments around the couple’s status outside the senior working-royal role. The friend said Harry remains a member of the Royal Family but is not part of the institution. That distinction is central to the source’s objection: in their view, people can be members of the family and pursue work without representing the Crown.
The supplied report does not include a direct response from Harry or Meghan, nor does it detail a formal change in their status. It describes the phrase as a point of frustration shared through a friend. The comments should therefore be read as an account of the couple’s reported preferences, not as an official statement setting out their position.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What the Source Does Not Establish
The friend was not named, and the supplied report does not say whether Harry and Meghan authorized the comments or have publicly endorsed them. Their dislike of the phrase is attributed to this source; it is not confirmed through a direct statement from either of them in the material provided.
The report also does not define which appearances count as official engagements, provide details about the Nottingham visit, or clarify the couple’s current formal standing within royal arrangements. Its account of a move to the United Kingdom and new schools for the children is presented as reported information, without supporting detail in the supplied material. Those points cannot be independently assessed from this source alone.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Whether the Couple Respond
No response or follow-up from Harry or Meghan is included in the source material, and no next statement or event is confirmed. The immediate development is the friend’s account of their objection to the phrase, as reported by The Times and summarized by Marie Claire.
Further clarification would depend on a direct comment from the couple or a fuller account from the publication about the source and the circumstances of the remarks. Until then, the distinction between their reported preference and an official position remains important.
royal family history documentary DVD
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Key Questions
What phrase do Harry and Meghan reportedly dislike?
An unnamed friend told The Times that they dislike “working members of the Royal Family.”
Who said the couple dislike the phrase?
The claim came from a source described as a friend of the couple. The source was not named in the supplied report.
Why does the friend object to the wording?
The friend said it could imply that Harry and Meghan work for the royal institution. The source argued that they remain members of the Royal Family while pursuing work outside that institution.
Have Harry and Meghan publicly confirmed this view?
Not in the material provided. The comments are attributed to their unnamed friend, and the report includes no direct statement from either of them.
Source: rss
Halloween Picks
halloween
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
